Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology

Share this post

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Comprehensive Analysis of the Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability - Protecting Care Access (HTI-3) Final Rule: Changes from Proposed Rule

Comprehensive Analysis of the Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability - Protecting Care Access (HTI-3) Final Rule: Changes from Proposed Rule

Trey Rawles's avatar
Trey Rawles
Dec 18, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Comprehensive Analysis of the Health Data, Technology, and Interoperability - Protecting Care Access (HTI-3) Final Rule: Changes from Proposed Rule
1
Share

The HTI-3 Final Rule incorporates several changes from the original proposed rule to address stakeholder feedback, operational feasibility, and evolving healthcare needs. Below is a detailed breakdown of what was added, removed, or edited compared to the proposed rule:

Changes Introduced in the HTI-3 Final Rule

1. Information Blocking Adjustments

Privacy Exception Updates (§171.202):

  • Proposed Rule: Restricted individual-requested limitations to cases where other laws did not mandate sharing.

  • Final Rule Change: Broadened to allow individuals to request EHI restrictions regardless of existing legal mandates, as long as the actor complies with sub-exception requirements. This addresses concerns about respecting patient autonomy while aligning with broader privacy goals.

  • Removed from Proposed Rule: Requirement for actors to document and justify the decision to honor individual restrictions based on external legal obligations.

Infeasibility Exception Updates (§171.204):

  • Proposed Rule: Focused narrowly on technical infeasibilities, such as interoperability challenges.

  • Final Rule Change: Expanded the segmentation condition to cover all sub-exceptions under the Privacy Exception and the new Protecting Care Access Exception. This provides flexibility for actors dealing with overlapping or conflicting data-sharing requirements.

  • Edited Proposal: Simplified language around segmentation to reduce ambiguity and allow actors more discretion in handling technical limitations.

Protecting Care Access Exception (§171.206):

  • Proposed Rule: Introduced as a concept to protect reproductive health information but lacked clear operational definitions.

  • Final Rule Change: Codified this as a formal exception with a detailed “good faith belief” standard. Actors are now explicitly protected when withholding EHI to shield patients or providers from legal risks associated with reproductive health care.

  • New Addition: Explicit alignment with the definition of “reproductive health care” under 45 CFR 160.103 to ensure standard interpretation across states.

2. Revised Certification Criteria

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Trey Rawles
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share