Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology

The 2027 Fee Schedule Money Section: Conversion Factor Cuts, the G2211 Modifier Swap, a 32 Percent ACO Recruiting Tool, the Remote Monitoring Employment Bomb, and Practice Expense Leaving 2007

Jul 18, 2026
∙ Paid

🎧 Podcast episode for paid subscribers only. Also available on Spotify.

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology
The 2027 Fee Schedule Money Section: Conversion Factor Cuts, the G2211 Modifier Swap, a 32 Percent ACO Recruiting Tool, the Remote Monitoring Employment Bomb, and Practice Expense Leaving 2007
CMS just published the 2027 fee schedule proposal and buried a 32% E/M payment modifier inside it. Here is what that means for every primary care practice in America…
Listen now
4 hours ago · Thoughts on Healthcare

To listen to paid episodes in Apple or Spotify, link your Substack subscription via the show settings on those platforms (instructions inside the Substack app under Subscriptions → Podcast).

Abstract

This article covers the payment mechanics of CMS 1848 P, where the dollars actually move. Key proposals:

  1. Proposed CY 2027 conversion factors of $33.17 for QPs (down 1.19 percent) and $32.84 for non QPs (down 1.68 percent), driven by expiration of the one year 2.50 percent WFTC bump

  2. Same day E/M plus global procedure by the same practice: highest priced service at 100 percent, everything else at 50 percent

  3. G2211 replaced by modifiers: MOD1 adds 16 percent to the E/M base code; MOD2 adds 32 percent for MSSP ACO practitioners and LEAD Model participant providers, billable for all beneficiaries served, and flows into assignment, benchmarks, and performance year spend

  4. Remote monitoring: RTM limited to established patients, initiating visit required for RPM and RTM, payment only for services performed by employed clinical staff rather than contractors, device inputs revalued downward, and a comment solicitation on collapsing the CPT families into four new G codes

  5. Practice expense: phase out of the specialty PE per hour scaling step anchored to 2007 or earlier data, replaced by a stabilizer; SNF Part A stay indirect PE adjustment; comment sought on the facility versus non facility differential for employed physicians

  6. Global surgery: MACRA 523 data collection paused, public use file of imputed post op visit RVUs published, revaluation openly teed up

  7. New coding for shared medical appointments, clinical staff advance care planning codes, SBIRT and tobacco cessation work RVU catch up, DSMT and MNT as stand alone RHC visits

  8. A 340B Part D claims repository requirement starting January 2027 and a duplicate testing interoperability RFI

  9. The build list: MOD2 aware revenue and ACO accounting, employed model RPM enablement, PE cost evidence platforms, global period exposure analytics

    Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Table of contents

The conversion factor cliff nobody should pretend is a surprise

Same day E/M and the global period squeeze

G2211 dies and becomes two modifiers

MOD2 math and the 32 percent recruiting tool

The remote monitoring employment bomb

The G code bundling threat is the bigger bomb

Practice expense wakes up from 2007

The primary care repricing RFI is the whole ballgame

Odds and ends that are secretly product categories

The build list

The conversion factor cliff nobody should pretend is a surprise

Start with the number every practice CFO flips to first. The proposed CY 2027 conversion factor is $33.17 for qualifying APM participants and $32.84 for everyone else. That looks like a cut because it is one: down $0.40 or 1.19 percent for QPs and down $0.56 or 1.68 percent for non QPs versus 2026. The arithmetic underneath is worth spelling out because it explains the politics of the next six months. The statutory updates are positive, 0.75 percent for QPs and 0.25 percent for non QPs, and there is another positive 0.53 percent adjustment for proposed work RVU changes. The problem is that the Working Families Tax Cut legislation handed the fee schedule a one year 2.50 percent bump for 2026 only, and that bump now walks out the door. Current law simply requires the cliff. Expect the usual year end congressional patch drama, and expect it to matter more this time because the QP versus non QP spread is now permanent and compounding at half a point per year. The two conversion factor structure means every payment discussion in this rule is really two discussions, and every model a practice builds needs a QP toggle.

The strategic takeaway is that CMS has stopped hiding the ball. The base fee schedule is designed to erode in real terms, the QP differential is designed to widen, and the only structurally growing payment concepts in the rule attach to accountable care participation. The fee for service rate is becoming the mattress in a store that makes its money on the delivery fees.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Thoughts on Healthcare.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Healthcare Markets & Technology · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture