Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology

Share this post

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
The Rise of Self-Insurance: Starting With Employee Healthcare but Growing Beyond

The Rise of Self-Insurance: Starting With Employee Healthcare but Growing Beyond

Trey Rawles's avatar
Trey Rawles
Dec 14, 2024
∙ Paid

Share this post

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology
The Rise of Self-Insurance: Starting With Employee Healthcare but Growing Beyond
3
1
Share

In the sprawling landscape of American healthcare, there exists a fascinating phenomenon that has reshaped how millions of workers receive their health benefits. Picture walking into any major corporation in America - whether it's a bustling tech campus in Silicon Valley, a manufacturing plant in the Midwest, or a retail chain's corporate headquarters in the South. While the employees there might think they have traditional health insurance from well-known carriers like Blue Cross Blue Shield or UnitedHealthcare, many are actually covered by their employer's self-funded health plan. This arrangement, though invisible to most workers, represents a fundamental shift in how companies approach healthcare benefits.

The Evolution of Employer Sponsored Healthcare Self-Insurance

The story of self-insurance in American healthcare begins in the 1970s, when rising healthcare costs prompted larger employers to seek innovative solutions. Traditional insurance carriers were raising premiums year after year, and companies began to question whether they could do better by taking matters into their own hands. The passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in 1974 provided the legal framework that would enable this transformation, exempting self-funded plans from state insurance regulations and allowing companies to operate under uniform federal guidelines.

Imagine you're the CEO of a large manufacturing company in 1975. Your CFO has just presented you with yet another double-digit increase in health insurance premiums. Your workforce is relatively young and healthy, yet you're paying rates based on a broader, often less healthy population. You begin to wonder: What if we could set aside our own money to pay claims, maintain more control over plan design, and potentially save money in the process? This was the genesis of the self-insurance movement.

Understanding Healthcare Self-Insurance: The Basics for Employers

To truly grasp the concept of self-insurance, let's break down how it differs from traditional, fully-insured arrangements. In a fully-insured plan, an employer pays a fixed premium to an insurance carrier, who then assumes all the risk and responsibility for paying claims. It's predictable but often expensive, like paying a premium to a car insurance company. The insurance company profits by charging more in premiums than it expects to pay in claims, plus administrative costs.

Self-insurance, however, operates differently. Instead of paying premiums to an insurance carrier, the employer sets aside money to pay claims directly. They typically hire a third-party administrator (TPA) to process claims and handle the day-to-day operations, but the financial risk - and potential reward - lies with the employer. It's akin to setting aside money in a separate account to cover potential car repairs instead of buying comprehensive auto insurance.

Who Self-Insures? A Profile of Self-Funded Employers

The landscape of self-insured employers is diverse, but patterns emerge when we examine who typically chooses this path. Size matters significantly in the decision to self-insure. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, approximately 64% of workers covered by employer-sponsored health insurance are in self-funded plans. However, this percentage varies dramatically by employer size.

Among large employers (those with 5,000 or more employees), self-insurance is the norm, with over 90% of workers in self-funded plans. These organizations have the financial resources to absorb potential claims volatility and the economies of scale to make self-insurance cost-effective. Think of companies like Boeing, Microsoft, or Walmart - their massive workforces provide a large enough risk pool to make self-insurance statistically predictable.

Mid-sized employers (500-4,999 employees) show mixed adoption, with self-insurance rates varying between 50% and 80%. These companies often carefully evaluate their workforce demographics, claims history, and risk tolerance before making the switch. The decision becomes more nuanced at this level, requiring detailed analysis of potential costs and benefits.

Small employers (fewer than 500 employees) traditionally stayed with fully-insured plans, but this is changing. Innovations in stop-loss insurance (protection against catastrophic claims) and the emergence of professional employer organizations (PEOs) have made self-insurance more accessible to smaller organizations. Today, even companies with as few as 50 employees might consider self-funding, particularly if they have a young, healthy workforce.

Industry Variations in Employer Healthcare Self-Insurance Adoption

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Thoughts on Healthcare Markets and Technology to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Trey Rawles
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share