Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology

The VC-Backed Health Tech Company the Industry Needs Right Now: A Neutral Clearing Utility for Prior Auth, Claims, and Disputes, and the Business Plan to Build the Visa of Healthcare

Sep 30, 2026
∙ Paid

🎧 Podcast episode for paid subscribers only. Also available on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Thoughts on Healthcare Markets & Technology
The VC-Backed Health Tech Company the Industry Needs Right Now: A Neutral Clearing Utility for Prior Auth, Claims, and Disputes, and the Business Plan to Build the Visa of Healthcare
In 1968, the NYSE closed Wednesdays because back offices couldn’t move paper fast enough. The fix was a neutral clearing utility that nobody thinks about today. Healthcare has the same problem. It has never built the fix…
Listen now
7 minutes ago

To listen to paid episodes in Apple or Spotify, link your Substack subscription via the show settings on those platforms (instructions inside the Substack app under Subscriptions → Podcast).

Abstract

  • The pitch: a neutral, venture-built clearing utility that sits between payers and providers for prior authorization, clinical evidence, claims status, and disputes, with published machine-readable rules, deterministic adjudication, and a public scoreboard. Working name Switch.

  • Why the market is open: the largest rails are owned by the largest payer and went dark for weeks in 2024, the second largest are owned by a consortium of plans, the third are being built by an EHR vendor for its own customers, and everyone else sells shovels for the denial war.

  • Why now: CMS-0057-F prior-auth process requirements generally took effect January 1, 2026, while the API requirements generally take effect January 1, 2027, for Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and CHIP programs and managed care plans, and Qualified Health Plans on federally facilitated exchanges; the AHIP pledge extends similar goals to participating commercial plans, WISeR brings algorithmic prior auth to traditional Medicare, and LLMs made chart-to-evidence extraction inexpensive, which moved the bottleneck from reading to trust.

  • TAM: five trillion of spend, about a trillion of admin, roughly $265 billion of administrative complexity waste, on the order of $60 billion in transaction handling, and a rails layer billing $4 to $6 billion today. Capturable software revenue of $15 to $25 billion a year, funded by the $265 billion both sides currently burn fighting each other.

  • Build: registry (rules, directory, eligibility) first, switch (transactions) second, clearing (netting, settlement, disputes, scoreboard) third. LLMs at the edges, determinism in the core.

  • Money: $300 to $400 million over five years, both-sides per-transaction pricing on a published schedule, neutrality baked into a public benefit charter with a poison pill against payer or EHR ownership, and a Visa 2008 style listing instead of a sale to a strategic.

Table of Contents

  1. Wall Street closed on Wednesdays once, and healthcare never reopened

  2. The company: a neutral clearing utility for the payer-provider transaction

  3. Why the incumbents can’t build it, including the ones who could

  4. Why now: 0057-F, the Change outage, and the agent arms race

  5. Sizing it: a $265 billion friction pool with a $20 billion software business underneath

  6. The product in three layers: registry, switch, clearing

  7. LLMs at the edges, determinism in the core

  8. Cold start: getting both sides on the rails without being owned by either

  9. Business model, capital plan, and the Visa 2008 exit

  10. What kills it, and the ask

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Thoughts on Healthcare.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Healthcare Markets & Technology · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture